🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.